How to explain design to non-designers [#uxchat roundup]

Explaining design to non-designers

Photo credit: foilman via flickr

“No… it’s not art. It’s more analytical. How do you feel about door handles? No… not in an emotional sense. Don Norman says… Ah, I give up!”

Explaining the concept of design to non-converts is rarely as straightforward as we imagine. Especially if said non-converts already carry preconceptions about what they think “design” means.

It’s easier to fill up an empty vessel than it is to fill up a full one.

Fret not – your friendly, neighbourhood UXperts (I know… I cringed too) are here to help. Our latest #uxchat was guest hosted by Jonathan Lupo, a man so blessed with foresight that he (somehow) locked down the @userexperience Twitter handle.

UX pros discussed with Jonathan questions relating to the challenge of explaining design to non-designers.

If you’d like to join our next #uxchat – a 1-hour session, every Thursday, where pros discuss a problematic or interesting UX topic on Twitter – follow the WhatUsersDo page. You can follow the rabbit hole for each tweet by clicking on it and reading the entire thread.

The struggle is real… no really – how do we get tangible about the abstract aspects of UX?

Nathalie Zey, a user experience and visual designer, struggles to get real about UX.

Jonathan explains that design thinking might come in handy for Nathalie. Design thinking has been described by Andy Rogers, founder of Rokker (a business design consultancy), as having 3 main qualities:

  • Inherent agility – ability to keep up with constant changes and improvements
  • Human-centeredness – ability to incorporate and meet the needs of people
  • Goal-orientated – ability to achieve a desired outcome

Andy has found that connecting design with the act of solving tangible, real-life problems makes the concept easier to grasp. You should check out the full interview with Andy Rogers if all this sounds helpful.

Jonathan also notes that there might be a semantical issue here – people associate the word “design” solely with aesthetics, rather than with process of solving problems as well.

Regarding this issue, being goal-oriented comes into sharp focus. Always having a quantitatively or qualitatively measurable outcome goes a long way towards reshaping this common misconception.

Some would argue that if you’re “designing” something without a goal in mind, you’re not designing at all – you’re creating art. You’d be justified in buying a beret, and creating baffling yet brilliant experiences.

When explaining design, should you focus on the process or on deliverables?

This one turned up the heat. Megan Willis, a Welsh fruit (of no relation to Bruce Willis) and UX researcher, felt Jonathan and Paul Randall were barking up the wrong tree.

Although Jonathan agreed that focussing on the finished article can communicate the value of what came before it, doing so can also lead to a habit of endless tampering.

If clients think design is simply about improving the thing (rather than the logic which helped identify what qualifies as an improvement), then their focus will be on… “improving”  the thing.

I’m sure we all know the dangers of treating a deliverable like a toy to be tweaked and tampered with, ad nauseam.

On the other hand, is it too utopian to expect non-designers to give a rat’s arse about design processes? Is any level of geekery too much – and should we focus on giving only as much detail as is necessary to understand why the finished article is the way it is?

I can only draw on my time as a digital professional and limited experience in UX, and say it depends on the person you’re talking to.

If you’re lucky enough to stumble on a non-designer who’s gagging to hear all about design thinking, don’t hesitate to feed their enthusiasm. It might even be the catalyst for a career change.

But if your audience is clearly not that interested in design, maybe it’s worth delivering results and calling it a day. They might not fully understand what design thinking entails… but they’ll be certain that it works.

Enjoyed reading this article? Follow us on Twitter and join in during our next #uxchat – maybe we’ll feature your gorgeous mug and cutting commentary in the roundup.

Get a newsletter that isn't all about us...

Subscribe for weekly, hand-picked articles about UX, design, and more every Friday—from the Be Good to Your Users blog and the rest of the whole darn web.

...get a little taste right here. 👅 🍭

Timi is a London-based copywriter and full-time marketing sceptic – there are now more unvalidated opinions out there than ever. He became a UX testing enthusiast after seeing its power while working at TUI – the world’s largest travel, leisure and tourism company. He then joined WhatUsersDo to sharpen his UX knowledge and work side-by-side with the field’s best and brightest.

Leave a Reply